The Geopolitical Significance of the Middle Corridor in Eurasian Politics

Main Article Content

Sultanli Sadig

Abstract

In the modern world, the Middle Corridor stands out as an important Eurasian transit corridor linking China and Europe via Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, the South Caucasus, and Türkiye. Growing geopolitical tensions, changes in supply chains, and the shift in global trade flows make this route increasingly relevant in comparison to other Northern and Southern corridors. In this regard, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the geopolitical importance of the Middle Corridor in Eurasian politics of today. The analysis of the interest of China, the EU, Türkiye, Azerbaijan, and Central Asian countries in the Middle Corridor would be conducted based on qualitative methods and comparative analysis of transport corridors. The research reveals that the Middle Corridor ensures better connectivity in the region, lowers the risk of dependence on the transit routes used, and builds economic and geopolitical resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are presented in the text of the scientific work.

Section

Political science and Public administration

Author Biography

Sultanli Sadig, University of Opole Global Studies

Science Expert; University of Opole Global Studies; Republic of Poland

How to Cite

Sultanli, S. (2026). The Geopolitical Significance of the Middle Corridor in Eurasian Politics. Scientific Collection «InterConf», 301, 50-60. https://interconf.openpubarchive.com/index.php/proceeding/article/view/20

References

Asian Development Bank (2023). Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Program: Transport Sector Progress Report. Manila: ADB.

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (2024). Eurasian Connectivity and Infrastructure Development Report. Beijing: AIIB.

Bechev, D. (2022). Russia and Eurasia’s Transport Geopolitics. London: Oxford University Press.

European Commission (2025). Global Gateway: EU Strategy for Connectivity in Eurasia. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission (2026). Sustainable Transport Connections between Europe and Central Asia. Brussels: EC Directorate -General for Mobility and Transport.

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2024). Trade and Transport Facilitation in Central Asia. London: EBRD.

ESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) (2023). Enhancing Eurasian Transport Corridors. Bangkok: United Nations.

International Transport Forum (OECD) (2025). Transport Connectivity in Eurasia: Policy Perspectives. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Kenderdine, T. (2023). “The Trans -Caspian Corridor and Eurasian Logistics Shifts.” Journal of Eurasian Studies, 14(2), 101–118.

Laruelle, M. (2021). Central Asia in the Global Economy: Connectivity and Geopolitics. Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.

OECD (2024). Eurasian Transport Corridors: Competitiveness and Risks. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Oxford Business Group (2025). The Middle Corridor: Trade and Infrastructure Outlook. London: OBG.

Pomfret, R. (2022). The Central Asian Economies in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press.

Shahbazov, F. (2024). “Azerbaijan as a Key Transit Hub in the Middle Corridor.” Caucasus Strategic Review, 9(1), 45–62.

Steadman, L. (2023). Belt and Road Initiative and Eurasian Connectivity. London: Routledge.

Trans-Caspian International Transport Route Association (2025). Annual Report on TITR Development. Astana.

UNCTAD (2024). Review of Maritime Transport and Multimodal Connectivity. Geneva: United Nations.

World Bank (2023). Resilient Supply Chains and Transport Corridors in Eurasia. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

World Bank (2025). Middle Corridor Performance and Trade Facilitation Analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zhang, H. (2024). “China’s Belt and Road and the Middle Corridor Evolution.” Asia Europe Journal, 22(3), 233–251.